The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce garden fertilizer (compost).
The diagram illustrates the process of creating a compost as garden fertilizer out of recycled organic waste materials such as leftover foods, newspapers and grasses.
In general, there are five various steps that need to be followed meticulously in order to come up with a compost.
To start with, a 2 cubic meter plastic container, with air vents on each side of its body, should be available. This will serve as a basin wherein the compost will be kept for processing. This receptacle should be then filled with the organic waste at an accurate measurement and order. First would be the container should be filled up with the waste food at 15cm in height from the bottom, followed by 15cm of grass and finally, newspapers on top not exceeding the second air vent.
The third process would be incorporating nitrogen into the mixture and it should be noted that water can be put only if the climate is hot. After that, the fourth step, the container should be kept closed and wait for 6 months to allow decomposition to take place. It can be seen that during this stage, the heat vaporizes and it escapes from the air vents located on the sides of the plastic receptacle. Finally, after 6 months of waiting, fertilizer is produced and is ready for use in the garden.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, then, third, in general, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70089285714 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56272942602 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575892857143 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8799350649 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148140848511 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725029283263 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105539610377 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126871125226 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129290499225 0.0819641961636 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.