The diagram below shows the process for making a water clock.
The given diagram illustrate information about that the diagram shows the various stages and equipment process of making a water clock. It is clear and coherent represntation.
The overall pattern amerging task type highlights that take one stand, two plastic bottles taken can be one stand, a tap for water, a straw and glue for preperation making a water clock.
Firstly, we need water which through into the tap and also to fall the water, and which bottle attach to with the stand and help to the tape. Secondly, on the top of the plastic bottle one straw to add the glue, and when fill top of the bottle to overflow of the water. Thirdly, to cover this hole with your finger and stop the water to fall afterwards this bottle to fill of the water and also have been remove your finger away this hole. Lastly, the second plastic bottle cut off the head and also first bottle to fall the water in the second plastic bottle. This plastic bottle measure the water levels per minute. The end of the level two plastic bottles this session to empty and the repeat of the process.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5641025641 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13002702369 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7483724328 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26841306142 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116293847327 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136343326123 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246623759543 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128836537386 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.