The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The process illustrates how to recycle plastic bottles. It is evident that there are nine stages in the process of renewing used bottles, beginning with the collection of unutilized bottles and ending with the products made from recycling plastics.
At the first stage, bottles are collected from the bins which are placed in public locations or private houses and then, transported to the recycling centres by trucks gathering rubbish. Afterward, trash is sorted by hand and classified into two types: renewable bottles and wastes. In the next stage, the plastic bottles that are able to recycle are shaped in square blocks under the pressure and crushed into particles.
After being cleaned in the water pool, these microplastics are put in the machine that producing plastic pellets. In the following stage, plastic pellets are transformed into raw material through the process of heating. Finally, the outcome is plastic products made from raw materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...astic products made from raw materials.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33552631579 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58242749883 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4313648865 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161787877469 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771265632652 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439089300453 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110984540465 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024432407426 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.