The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different
countries in 2002.

The given table compares the budget people in five nations spending on three categories of products and servies in 2002
Overall, it is apparent that the largest incomes of all countries was used for food, drink and tobacco and the least of that for pastime and education.
In term of food, drinks and tobacco, the percentage of consumer expenditure in Turkey was the highest, at 32,14%. The figures for Ireland, Spain and Italy was lower, at 28,91%, 18,80% and 16,36%, respectively . However, the amount of money spent by the Swedish accounted for the lowest proportion, at only nearly 16%.
Regarding clothing and footwear, the Italian spent 9% of their incomes compared to only 5,40% used by the Swedish. The figures of remaining nations was around 6%. In addition, the proportion of spending on leisure and education of Turkey citizens was 4,35%. At the same time, around 3% of Italian and Swedish incomes was paid on recreations and teaching services and only approximately 2% of the budget of people in Ireland and Spain fell on this category.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the largest incomes of all countries was used for food, drink and tobacco and...
^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... 28,91%, 18,80% and 16,36%, respectively . However, the amount of money spent by t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98863636364 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60998605269 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6472758258 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0721508904882 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282166599537 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458979148171 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613062835103 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664170131392 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.