The illustration represents the processes for the production of black tea in comparison between two methods.
In general, the procedure of making black tea is a five step process.
The first three steps are included with one purpose that is to prepare the materials needed for tea production. First of all, tea leaves must be picked up from the tree. However, only bud and two top leaves are picked in order to guarantee the quality of the final product. Second, the leaves are withered in a rack by air. The leaves are drained out 60% of moisture after this. Third, follow traditional method, loose tea is created by rolling leaves flat and broken which release enzymes from leaves. Meanwhile, in the modern method, leaves go through a quick process consists of cut, torn and curled results in smaller granular pieces (tea bags).
After the three steps of preparation, the leaves are ready for the oxidation process. By spreading rolled tea or tea bags on tiles or cement, a chemical decomposition reaction will happen that cause the tea to change to copper colour. Finally, the fermented tea leaves are put inside oven for drying. When about 97% moisture is loss in total and followed by aroma unleash, we receive the final production of the process.
- The graph below shows the weekday volume of passenger activity on the Toronto Metro system for July 2007Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows two different processes for manufacturing black tea. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature. and make comparison where relevant. 73
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, third, while, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88785046729 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49480200293 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7883656665 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4615384615 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4615384615 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183211852337 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732563889566 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718981786231 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164073958081 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0693548354571 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.