The diagram gives information about the process of making pulp and paper.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram shows us about the steps to make pulps and papers from trees. Overall, it divided into two processes of manufacturing pulps from trees and transforming the pulps into papers.
First, the trees are cut into logs. Second, they goes into chipping and digested along with purchased chips to produce pulps. Next, the pulps are cleaned in the washers and heading to the pulp screen, resulting a clean pulp.
The clean pulps can be processed into two types of papers. To create rough papers like in the boxes, they need to be put in the pulp former. After that, they are dried and goes to the pulp reel. Finally, they are cut using the pulp cutter before they are ready to become paper bales. On the other hand, we can also make refined papers for printing purpose. The pulps need to be cleaned and dried first, then they can be pressed with pulp presses and paper presses. Lastly, they are dried again so the paper rolls are ready to be sold in the market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...e trees are cut into logs. Second, they goes into chipping and digested along with p...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, lastly, second, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 794.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53714285714 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.00533166884 2.65546596893 76% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525714285714 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5501675683 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.1666666667 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.5833333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173139872018 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754578594137 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646148644415 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132130656218 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642451780318 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.65 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.46 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.