Diagram shows the development of the island.
Diagram shows changes which occurred after the decision to transform deserted island into recreational center with relevant infrastructure.
Overall, implemented decisions which were done by constructors were aimed to provide all the necessary services for people on vacation.
Reception was built in the middle of island to make it easier for guests to find the required staff. Restaurant was erected on the border of island in the middle to show the nice view for guests while they are having food and drinks. Two complexes of huts were constructed on the left and right parts of the island to distribute the building evenly and give the space for guests. Pier was added on the southern part of the island to give guest possibility to rent boats for sailing or park their own. A beach was developed according to the international safety standards on the western part of island to give guests guest possibility to swim in the comfortable environment
As facilities were built all over the island constructors developed necessary pathways for staff members and guests. A footpath was designed covering all the necessary places of visit to ease walking of guests on island. A vehicle track was provided covering the area of restaurant and reception to minimize the time of communication and delivery between those two buildings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...it to ease walking of guests on island. A vehicle track was provided covering the...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.133640553 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82399381533 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2499347939 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.777777778 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255769502565 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100151540511 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808198294552 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140441271125 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926562748157 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.