Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have a risk. Do you think that advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages?
It is often argued that popularity of online networks with users of all ages is growing dramatically, yet feeding personal data to these platforms is unsafe. This essay will argue that the disadvantages of social media outweigh their benefits. It will first provide the evidence of high likelihood of personal data leak and safety risk for less protected and vulnerable age group like children and seniors, followed by an analysis of their positive influence on way of communication.
The main drawbacks of sharing personal details on the Internet are advertising spam and fraud, that have undesirable implications. During the process of registration, new users disclose their real names, banking details, and cell phone numbers, which advertising companies take advantage of, by setting targeting tools and promoting some goods or services. That is to say that social network profile becomes an object for marketing or social research, despite the fact the initial user’s aim was to join the community and make new friends or social links. Current social targeting vehicles are the huge business which take roots particularly from the social networks, such as Instagram. Moreover, defenseless age groups like young children or the elderly could fall prey to frauds, when they start to communicate with a stranger.
Those opposed to this say that social media have brought a positive effect to different realms of people’s lives. First of all, such novelty allows people to keep social links for ages, simply scrolling the Facebook feed and monitoring the posts with photos. However, such demonstration of personal information may attract attention of advertisers or even villains.
In conclusion, the fact that vulnerability of private data within the social media is an obvious drawback that could limit the attractiveness of its usage for exchanging ideas.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42808219178 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83707815876 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.512742416 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.083333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319465483758 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108338297451 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684489103668 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176762911556 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278056082055 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.