The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
The flow diagram depicts the rainwater collection process to produce drinking water in an Australian town. Overall, four primary steps are identified in the whole process, starting from rainwater collection and culminating in a water treatment stage.
Initially, as rain falls on the rooftop of houses, the rainwater is collected by the gutters towards pipes located on the side of each home. Next, the water goes through an underground line to a water filter containment for a water purification process, aiming at separating any tiny, detrimental particles from the water. Following this step, the purified water is channeled through a large connector, and this procedure allows the water to flow directly to a water storage container.
Moreover, the last stage is the water treatment process for the stored water. The water subsequently flows to a water treatment tank. In this place, additional chemical substances are added to enhance water’s quality for the water to be congruent with the drinking water standard. Afterward, the drinking water process is completed, and the drinkable water travels along pipes connecting the water treatment to houses’ tap facility. This process leads back the water to houses and eventually, the water is ready to be distributed and consumed by people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37745098039 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.830410155 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553921568627 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1947576951 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.7 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339858098789 0.215688989381 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16896729912 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116853811406 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266712095633 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804735335726 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.