The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012.
The maps illustrate changes in the layout of Happy Valley Shopping Centre over the period of thirty years from 1982 to 2012.
It is clear that this centre witnessed a significant change in terms of both scale and different inner sectors.
In 1982, visitors had to go along the road and through doors which led into a lobby, However, this road was demolished to make room for the parking lot, which was shown on the 2012's layout. Moreover, the building space was expanded extensively due to the construction of the furniture retail which superseded the lake in 1982.
The different areas inside the building changed nearly completely. To be specific, three reaming sectors which were sports, electronics and food store were relocated. Besides, a chain of restaurants occupied the area that was used for sports and electronics store. At the left-hand corner of the building, the coffee shop was knocked down to make way for other sectors in the building.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Qualities which a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learnt at university or similar academic institutions Do you agree or disagree with this idea 89
- The following diagram shows how rainwater is reused for domestic purposes 69
- The diagram shows the process for recycling plastic bottles
- The table below gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56828615033 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6625 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.465467276 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192465099392 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858063766064 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125588712814 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149114713791 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151183884561 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.