The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960.

The maps demonstrate the development of Queen Mary hospital from 1960 to 2000, a period of four decades.

Overall, at the beginning of the period, the space was split into four sectors but started from 1980 until 2000, the area were divided into five sectors. During the construction, only the location of hospital and the car park that were remain the same whilst the location of other buildings changed in each period.

In 1960, there was shopping center next to the hospital close to the roadway. Exactly behind the mall, there was a farmland which was the largest space among the four in this period. Within twenty years, shopping center was demolished and replaced by cancer center and pharmacy. Like a mall, the farmland was also destroyed and become nursing school which was as big as a parking lot. Unfortunately, in 2000, the area for nursing academy and parking lot were reduced around 50 percent from the original place for the expansion of the cancer center area.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... of hospital and the car park that were remain the same whilst the location of other b...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88023952096 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37666473546 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0146450863 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0961567805789 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497435596814 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058745498758 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918988052895 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612043825808 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.