The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
You should write at least 150 words.
The graphs illustrate how a wave-energy machine works and in which locations it could be placed.
Overall, it is noticeable that there are several structures with different uses in the technology such as: 2 turbines, chambers and the electricity generator. Furthermore, the higher length the waves have, the taller wave-energy machines are.
As can be seen obviously, in order to make this machine profitable, it is located on the opposite side of the wave direction. These tides then could go into the bottom chamber of the technology, casing the water levels to rise higher. On the other hands, the air from the upper atmosphere flows through the first space on the upper left to make the turbine in the highest place rolling. After going through the first chamber, it meets the water surface in the bottom and returns back so as to create dynamics to activist the second turbine. Thus, electricity is produced by a generator which is connected to these active turbines.
In the second diagram, the position of the electricity-maker technology influences the cost of installation. To make a higher profits in electricity from taller waves, the machine has to be put in a deeper location which costs higher money to install. In a narrower place, although the installation costs is not as high as the previous ones, the wave-energy machine would make lower output and less energy was generated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'returns'.
Suggestion: returns
...ets the water surface in the bottom and returns back so as to create dynamics to activist th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... surface in the bottom and returns back so as to create dynamics to activist the second ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, then, thus, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02586206897 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85421648165 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590517241379 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8613098561 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126622935479 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508308650213 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499637124356 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08539536775 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225906165979 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.