The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided illustration shows the evolution of the horse started 40 million years ago with specifically changes in form of foot structure. Overall ,it is clear from diagram that horse has changed significantly in size of body.
Initially, the evolution started from Eohippus ,which had a small body and a snout. Its foot had tiny toes separated from each other. Eventually , after 10 million years this type of horse evolved into Mesohippus type. In which main changes observed in larger tail and longer snout. In addition, this species had foot structure changed from many toes to the three main parts of it.
Further an ancestor of modern horse called Merychippus substituted the last type in the third stage of the evolution respectively 15 million years ago .Consequently, transformation during this period is seen from the muzzle similarly to modern horse. At the same time ,the middle toe became dominant ,resembling a hoof. Over time, Merychippus evolved into well-known modern horse with developed elbow , ankle, long tail and crest.At this stage the structure of foot finally changed into fetlock and a present hoof emerged.
As a result, a horse went through four major evolutional steps before transforming into contemporary type.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anges in form of foot structure. Overall ,it is clear from diagram that horse has ...
^^
Line 2, column 47, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lly, the evolution started from Eohippus ,which had a small body and a snout. Its ...
^^
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...es separated from each other. Eventually , after 10 million years this type of hor...
^^
Line 2, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... structure changed from many toes to the three main parts of it. Further an ance...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...lution respectively 15 million years ago .Consequently, transformation during this...
^^
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...tion respectively 15 million years ago .Consequently, transformation during this period is s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ilarly to modern horse. At the same time ,the middle toe became dominant ,resembli...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ame time ,the middle toe became dominant ,resembling a hoof. Over time, Merychippu...
^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...-known modern horse with developed elbow , ankle, long tail and crest.At this stag...
^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...oped elbow , ankle, long tail and crest.At this stage the structure of foot finall...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, similarly, so, third, well, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27638190955 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79205114837 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623115577889 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.305763242 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4545454545 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120510212032 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459600254861 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375035409272 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764519519603 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413149078667 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.