The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pictures illustrate the evolution of the horse over a 40-year period.
From an overall perspective, it is apparent that there are four stages, beginning with the Ecohippus and ending with the horse at the present.
40 million years ago, the Ecohippus, the first horse, was quite small with a short tail and had no mane on its back. Its foot structure was quite simple and contained four digits which were relatively small. In the next stage, 30 million years ago, the Ecohippus evolved into Mesohippus with larger size and its foot reduced to three digits.
Then, 15 million years after, the horse had developed into Merychippus, with a similar size but had some significant changes in the structure of its foot. It still had three digits but had become much bigger. Especially, the middle digit had been dominant and divided into different segments.
Finally, the horse eventually grew into the modern ones with larger body size, curly mane, and long tail. There was a reduction in its digits, only a very big digit remained.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, still, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94857142857 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.409477884 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622857142857 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.2057448291 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116879977485 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565071260631 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761014728886 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883008995316 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863477248415 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.