The diagrams below show the development of a small fishing village and its surrounding area into a large European tourist resort from 1974 to 2004.
The development of a small fishing village and its ambiance in Europe has been plainly shown in these two diagrams from 1974 to 2004. Overall, there was a massive rise in total population 130,000 in 2004, where was used to be 12,000 in 1974.
In 2004, the number of hotels had changed the harbor and the boats along the beach. In the same time, the woodland simply switched to golf course, and olive plants entirely replaced with farmland (fruit and vegetable for hotels). It was a curvy road as a result of demolishing cattle: sheep and goats which significantly showed through the beach
Also, there were several fundamental changes for a village which is near to the mountain, where the village council added tourist shops, connected to the farmland and homes of locals in 2004. Interestingly, the original village had no changes in between 1974 and 2004.
In conclusion, the development of total population in a small coastal village is boomed in a large tourist place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | tahmeed1993 | 78 | view |
- Placing a limit on classroom size is the best way to ensure that every student gets sufficient help andresources from the instructor. 66
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this option What sort of punishment should parents and te 52
- Crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 56
- Government should spend more on science and research rather than economic or arts sectors To what extent do you agree 84
- Scientific fields of study require more critical thinking and research than other fields of study 37
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90963855422 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5819209643 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.764932767 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.428571429 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291623186931 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132223048469 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115586441221 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169670955468 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850505621408 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.