The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future.
The maps compare some differences between the present design of a university and the futuristic proposed layout following this building.
Overall, there is likely to be an expansion in terms of the car park and educational facilities as a preparation for the growing number of students. In addition, this educational institution is planned to be more developed with less natural beauty.
At present, there is a garden and a footpath at the top of the main college areas. However, in 2020, they are projected to be torn down to make room for the car park and some new regions in the major educational building, including a shop and toilets. At the moment, on two sides of the entrance that is under the walkway, there is a lunch area on the left and a classroom on the right. Meanwhile, in 2020, it is predicted that the lunch area stays unchanged, whereas a classroom will be erected next to the old one and the newly constructed toilets.
Regarding the rest of the university, a classroom is planned to be built in the replacement of the present reception, and another reception is probably erected along the hallway to the toilets. Currently, there are two schoolrooms beside the footpath, but the one near a bus stop will be exchanged with the library below the old reception. Similarly, the toilets at the top of this bus stop are forecasted to be converted into an entrance. Finally, the road and the bus stop at the bottom of the college zone are expected to remain.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, regarding, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7519379845 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7886943714 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9739812939 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112307858343 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440697034027 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414936164314 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061804132588 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01933406747 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.