Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?
It can be true that in modern life web-based shopping is becoming more and more ubiquitous. However, this trend has an intense effect on environmental matters as well as the labor market.
On the one hand, the development of e-commerce may have negative impacts on the environment. For example, rush delivery, which is often essentially associated with e-shopping, is widespread owing to its convenience and quickness. Despite this, a myriad of plastic can be generated from the process of packaging and distributing products. These redundant plastics, if not effectively treated, may cause serious repercussions including environmental pollution or global warming. Therefore, the more commonplace online shopping is, the more detrimental the environmental issues could be.
On the other hand, it is probable that the rise of shopping on the Internet has a positive influence on the job market. Not only does this tendency promote manufacturing industries and stores, but it also provides the unemployed with jobs such as sales workers or delivery people. In this way, e-commerce might tackle unemployment and boost the economy. Hence, many businesses and residents can benefit from shopping online.
In conclusion, web-based commercial activities are on the significant rise, and the environment, along with employment, tends to be profoundly affected by this movement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-21 | Mirajanecute | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | phuongphuongt1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 78 | view |
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 78
- The graphs show the changes in the UK steel industry between 1970 and 2000 84
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 56
- The charts give information concerning smartphone ownership as a percentage of population in Denmark and by level of education from 2000 to 2010 86
- Nowadays more and more young people who need employment have to compete with older people for the same jobs Why is this the case and what can be done to solve the problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1174.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 208.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64423076923 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18256158226 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673076923077 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8031383682 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153270085485 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514422599491 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375665757934 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881457372861 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022723973529 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.