Nowadays more and more young people who need employment have to compete with older people for the same jobs. Why is this the case and what can be done to solve the problem?
It is argued that in today’s world, more and more unemployed youngsters have to involve in a fierce competition with the elderly when applying for the same professions. In my opinion, various reasons have resulted in this tendency and several measures should be adopted by the government to tackle this issue.
On the one hand, I believe that there are a number of factors which push young residents into the rivalry in the job market with their older counterparts. The first reason can be a shortage in the number of job opportunities. In modern life, the young generation tends to have a preference for intellectual jobs, including entrepreneurship or medical treatment, rather than manual work. However, the senior residents are also likely to choose those professions that often do not strictly require physical health, so competition might be inevitable. The other one may be the lack of experience of younger applicants. Owing to that, employers could gravitate towards older inhabitants who regularly have more maturity and skills.
On the other hand, the authorities should implement some solutions in order to deal with this circumstance. Firstly, they should encourage the elderly to take some suitable lucrative jobs including home business or childcare. As a result, the old generation can have a steady job and earn a living, whereas the unemployed youth could get a job more conveniently. Secondly, it is probable that in several companies, retired employees tutor their inexperienced colleagues. For instance, in my father’s hospital, some middle-aged doctors instruct the newcomers, and they receive those young doctors’ salaries. Therefore, those young doctors could broaden their horizons, and then they may officially have an occupation and be paid after finishing their training course.
In conclusion, there are a host of causes of increasing competition between the old and the young in the labor market and steps need to be taken to resolve these obstacles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
...g course. In conclusion, there are a host of causes of increasing competition bet...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36305732484 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99370510817 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592356687898 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7810243213 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276021770421 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822877157825 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568938553232 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157239163417 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575990061978 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.