Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?
In this day and age, it is commonplace that people opt for e-shopping in preference to physical stores to go shopping. This trend may have the benefits for the environment and employment in the short term, the handicap; however, tends to be more prolonged in the long run.
Regarding the environment, the rate of heat-trapping gas released into the atmosphere is likely to wane in the first place, as the popularity of online shopping will not necessitate the use of private vehicles anymore. Indeed, goods will be all delivered by a large truck at once. Nevertheless, considering the long term, this will become the hazardous menace to the environment, because the convenience of home-shopping will provoke more and more shoppers to adapt this way, therefore the number of delivery vehicles will skyrocket, leaving the air heavily polluted. Moreover, e-retailing stands to increasingly promotes toxic chemicals usage and animal slaughtering during the speedy manufacture of clothes for humans. Hence, animal extinction will truly worsen the ecological imbalance.
With respect to the influence on the types of jobs in the labor market, various job opportunities with flexibility, such as online grocery personal shoppers, delivery drivers, online sellers and web designers, will be in a high demand, enabling everyone to make a fortune with just a smartphone. Favorable as it is, the bankruptcy of traditional retailers is easily predicted in the future. As a result, the percentage of jobless individuals cannot follow that of online-shopping-related occupations, pushing a country into a crisis of rapid unemployment.
To recapitulate, however shortly advantageous e-commerce is to the environment and labor market, it is obviously overshadowed by the negative aspects in the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 628, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'chemicals'' or 'chemical's'?
Suggestion: chemicals'; chemical's
...g stands to increasingly promotes toxic chemicals usage and animal slaughtering during th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, such as, as a result, with respect to, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48014440433 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33918430654 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0785814226 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2727272727 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162466499607 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498541556888 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361184970447 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880461584508 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344446649112 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.