The pie chart illustrates the proportion of UK student that how far did they organise financial management; whereas, the table depicts the proportion of well organised financial status based on the age categories
As the charts outline, a significant proportion of UK students fairly established their financial status; in contrast, an insignificant proportion of students not at all maintained anything. Nevertheless, almost the same proportion of candidates managed their financial and not very much. On the other hand, the financial regulation overwhelming maintained against the age increment.
In detail, concerning to pie chart, more than half of the proportion (55%) of the UK Scholars prepared their finances fairly; whereas, approximately one-fifth wisely organise their financial management and not so much organised. However, just four per cent of students not at all organised anything economically.
Regarding the table, up to the age of 22 years, the UK candidates organised their economical status, wisely with the figure 18% which grew to more than (26%) by the age of 23 to 25 years. Besides, this trend continued to rise by about 35% aged over 26 years. Overall, all students made 21%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...ears, the UK candidates organised their economical status, wisely with the figure 18% whic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43085106383 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07155405596 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61170212766 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 113.756318506 43.030603864 264% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 127.625 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131713523325 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535794545922 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403079784766 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917229471048 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384618907454 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.