Numerous general publications and print media indeed show famous well-known persons' private lifestyle to the current societies such as their eating habits, shopping, love affairs and often their private images. It is stated that this kind of phenomenon is completely unfair systems since this strategy defames their personality as well as dilute society.
To begin with, it is often said that magazines or newspaper should not unveil famous people private lifestyle to the modern world; otherwise, several serious consequences would be faced such as suicidal tendencies. To elaborate, many celebrities committed suicide due to unbearable filthy comments were received by communities since their privacy revealed to society by print media. For example, last year one of the famous persons of the daughter in India, hanged herself to death since her and her boyfriend's swimming photographs, which were half-naked, were secretly snapped by magazine industry and published without their knowledge; as a result, she committed suicide.
Moreover, society can be diluted with inappropriate content is being followed in the long run by young generations. The psychological survey revealed last year that many young generations are extremely addicted to their famous celebrities' private lifestyle like drinking, smoking, some adulterated content and their extramarital affairs, which altogether exploit immensely to current generation since they are being traced by attracting newspaper and magazines inappropriate information. Therefore, eminent persons private lifestyles should not be exploited.
In conclusion, indeed, magazines and newspapers' famous people's private information is totally unfair and inappropriate. So, it must be forbidden; otherwise, the above-mentioned serious circumstances would repeat.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...rations are extremely addicted to their famous celebrities private lifestyle like drinking, smokin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05447470817 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03416629733 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626459143969 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.4186222215 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.6 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210937639113 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817830458697 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689566376808 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126594909014 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00272218113351 0.056905535591 5% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.0946893788 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.11 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.