Industrial pollution is one of the significant issues to cause several health hazards to society as it is soaring all around the globe. Some people suggest imposing a tax on companies to combat this problem, whereas their counterparts believe seizing of unlicensed industries would curb the pollution problem. This essay discusses both sides of the argument, followed by my view.
On the one hand, it is often said that imposing a tax on companies might tackle pollution. Currently, most of the countries collect the fines from the number of industries based on their productivity and distribution to various destinations. For instance, in India, the Bharathi cement organisation produces 100 tonnes per day based on customers' orders; otherwise, they have to pay excess tax if an unlimited generation of cement. Conversely, bygone days they used to manufacture without any restrictions. Therefore, nowadays, they produce less productivity because of tax fear; hence, industrial pollution plummets.
On the other hand, seizing of unlicensed companies might reduce industrial pollution. As per government authorities raid on unauthorised Industries might spread fear to the public to shutdown companies as soon as possible. For example, nearly 2000 unlicenced Industries such as chemical paper production, electrical gadget generation, and et cetera were seized lost year in Beijing, China and after a couple of days, the pollution control board of China revealed that 10% of pollution rate dropped compared to the previous survey. Similarly, T G pesticides, an authorised one in Andhra Pradesh, India seized two years ago and after so many people shut down their companies themselves. Thus, the seizing of unlicenced industries reduces pollutions.
Having considered both sides of the debate, even though taxation might reducing the pollution, there is another method called seizing of unauthorised companies can guarantee to combat industrial pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nies might reduce industrial pollution. As per government authorities raid on unau...
^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: GOT_SHUTDOWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to shut down'?
Suggestion: to shut down
...ustries might spread fear to the public to shutdown companies as soon as possible. For exam...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, hence, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63175675676 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01770516565 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1901273482 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.071428571 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240810339155 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810719962242 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552116948484 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14142232075 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540530323191 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.