The bar chart illustrates the number of landline telephones per 1000 members in various nations between 2000 and 2004.
As the chart outlines, a significant number of landline phones utilised in Singapore in all given years per thousand capita, followed by Brunei Darussalam country. However, the least figure recorded in Lao PDR and Myanmar.
In detail, in Singapore, in 2000 and 2002, more than 450 landline telephones recorded, which was slightly dropped by about 20 telephones after two years per thousand people. Similarly, 250 landline telephones were used by Brunei Darussalam between 2000 and 2004 per 1000 capita; nevertheless, its figure roughly fell by almost 20 landline telephones in the year 2004. The landline telephone's figure illustrated between 50 to 100 in the Philippines, and Thailand in the entire period. However, the landline telephone ownership number displayed below 50 in the rest of the nations, such as Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam per 1000 people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations, such as Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Myanmar, and Vietnam per 1000 peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless, similarly, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4076433121 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79675138855 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5290191735 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311625600357 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149399185518 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683288350302 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209450064694 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750881758118 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.