The bar charts illustrate the number of UK's postgraduates and graduate students who did not take any full-time employment after completion of their colleges, although they had done a part-time, voluntary work, further study, and some of the candidates remained to have no employment in the year 2008.
As the charts outline, a significant number of both graduates and postgraduates finished their further studies, followed by doing a part-time job, whereas the least number of recorded in doing independent work.
In terms of UK graduates exception of full-time employment in 2008, 29665 graduate candidates completed further higher education after their college, followed by 17735 students who performed part-time employment, while just 3500 candidates had done their independent work. However, 16235 graduate students became unemployees.
As per postgraduates in 2008, 2725 students finished their further study, which was 190 members and 1100 candidates higher than that of part-time work and becoming unemployees respectively. Just 345 postgraduates had done their volunteer work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ime, voluntary work, further study, and some of the candidates remained to have no employme...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raduates finished their further studies, followed by doing a part-time job, where...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73770491803 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99691780314 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.1764380591 43.030603864 212% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.0 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372268593532 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213853059598 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.217093623684 0.0843802449381 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274466750598 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.232108239977 0.0819641961636 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.4140731707 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.