Nowadays, a choice of city for a living is a controversial debate as some people think vertical cities are the best to lead a comfortable life, whereas their counterparts believe horizontal cities are finer with very few multi-storey buildings. This essay discusses both sides of the argument before reaching my view.
On the one hand, it is often said that vertical city is the best remedy for various issues. For instance, the ever-growing population might lead to uncomfortable life for the public. Therefore, the construction of the multi-storey building could be a possible solution. In addition, for living and doing regular tasks, good inhabitation is the not only thing but also the construction of the other areas require such as health infrastructure, educational sectors, and road infrastructure. Thus, it demands to increase taller apartments for the growing population, and the rest of the space could be utilized for other useful areas. Beijing, China, is the best example for skyscrapers to make the possible solution for the increasing population.
On the other hand, it might be said that horizontal city could be better to make safeguard for the public from natural calamities. To exemplify, Vizag City, Andhra Pradesh, India has the most single-storey houses, so, it might have the reason to tolerate from flooding which attacked last year. Therefore, the Andhra Pradesh government initiated a law to build single-storey buildings; specifically, natural calamity prone regions, despite permitted to construct multi-storey apartments. Similarly, Nepal country, which is the best example to build most of the single-storey houses because of an earthquake. Thus, it seems that horizontal cities might play as a safeguard to prevent natural calamities.
Having considered both sides of the arguments, even though horizontal cities might prevent natural calamities, the vertical cities are the best solution for various reasons; therefore, multi-storey buildings are the best to lead a comfortable life for the people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 965.302439024 179% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5303514377 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11657698251 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539936102236 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 283.868780488 188% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3110982443 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170058054858 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613547831382 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809458721868 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139629993224 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116057455095 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 40.7170731707 221% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.