It is inevitable say that in this modern era, parents have an insignificant time to allocate for their children; as a result, the children are received less attention from those than their counterparts in the bygone era. I agree with this notion because parents possess a hectic schedule which develops this phenomenon.
To begin with, it is often said that the contemporary world makes the parents obtain a hectic lifestyle. Since concerning seriously with rival parents' earnings, fame and reputation, parents strive immensely around the clock to increase their bank balance as well as a credit within the society, which cause the parents to contribute their precious time insignificantly with their children. If it runs prolonged time, series circumstances can occur in a child's life. The latest global survey revealed that an incredible proportion (70%) of parents travel to various destinations for their employment and business, which phenomena bring a huge negative impact on a relationship with their kids. Therefore, due to their past faced lifestyle, parents are unable to contribute much time for their children.
Moreover, since both mother and father work incredibly for their family, they have to travel away from their family which makes them unable to carry their children as an account immense accommodation problem, weather adjustments and inappropriate locations, which all these circumstances arrange a babysitter or a caretaker at their residences; hence, the children are unable to develop a crucial or healthy relationship with their parents. In contrast, in the bygone era, if they both parents were being worked relentlessly earlier, once they produced children, a mother resigned for her employment sector and allocated her entire life for their children's development since the duo recognised children's life was the top prioritised one, regardless of how much money they earned; hence, parents contributed a huge amount of time with their children in earlier days.
In conclusion, indeed, modern children obtained less attention from their parents than their counterparts did in the bygone world due to advanced busy lifestyle that the current generation parents possess.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50147492625 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8945885234 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560471976401 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.991839734 49.4020404114 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.5 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435962903092 0.244688304435 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197160367336 0.084324248473 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113508973672 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304345256654 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133562885407 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.