The first pie chart illustrates the energy, which is utilized in an average Australian household, whereas the second pie chart depicts the greenhouse gas emission by these consumptions.
As the outline of the chart, both refrigeration and lighting release gas emissions double than that of their energy consumption. Conversely, the heating method is produced less than its energy utilization.
In detail, in Australian household energy consumption, the eating process requires 42% of energy, which is the highest energy utilized one, followed by the second most category is water heating method, which is consumed 30%. While refrigeration process consumes 7% of energy, which is almost double than that of lighting (4%), and triple than the cooling (2%), and other appliances consume 15% of energy.
In terms of greenhouse gas emission by these household things, around 15% of greenhouse gas is released from heating and refrigeration, whereas the water heating method produces double than these. Lighting emissions 8% gas, which is more than that of cooling (3%). As per other appliances which generate 28% of greenhouse gas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... which is more than that of cooling 3%. As per other appliances which generate 28%...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45714285714 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84813436968 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7613158185 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2971148852 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142776018982 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899684128001 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202828850689 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812286919918 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.