Indeed, the global climate fluctuates tremendously due to human activities. Some people state that individuals can prevent global climate variations; whereas their counterparts think that the individuals' actions are not worthy, despite governments and the large business companies could bring a huge difference. This essay illustrates both views, followed by my notion.
On the one hand, it is often said that the human can aid to halt global climate change by oneself since the utilisation of the public transportation, opting e-vehicles and accessing the carpooling journey which all plunge the pollution within the atmosphere; as a result, decreasing ozone depletion. Moreover, it is an extremely individual responsibility that the planting trees within the own garden or in the forest. There are numerous examples that as an account of auspicious days such as birthdays, marriage anniversaries people plant the various kinds of trees to promote the greenery. Therefore, people are the prime responsible members to forbidden the dangerous global climate changes.
On the other hand, it is stated that the government administrations play a vital role to prevent global climate fluctuations. The government sectors initiate stringent regulations for the public to avoid unwanted wastage, establishing waste management dustbins; for instance, GHMC (government health municipal corporation) which aids the public in numerous ways in Indian jurisdiction. Furthermore, the government sector, which accompanying the corporate industry to ban plastic utilisation. Hence, many states of India do not circulate plastic things which strategy spreads to the rest of the globe. Therefore, it is highly hoped that global warming and glacier melting could plummet
In conclusion, even though the government sectors and corporate Industries togetherly responsible to decrease global climate fluctuations, the individuals, who are fundamentally responsible for preventing global climate change.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92682926829 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16734513022 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620209059233 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.6090516372 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.75 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291064078574 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936807806383 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977448207263 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171539765136 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858726507893 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.