A job is necessary for living. A few people say that it is good for a better career if the employers ask employees' personal information such as hobbies, interest and marital status, however, others opposed it. In this essay, I will illustrate the merits and demerits of such practices by employers then provides my own opinion.
These days millions of companies recruiting job seekers through identifying personal information for both benefited employees and company. some companies send employees globally for productivity and gaining skills at coastal areas but some employees opposed to seeking an offer as because of they unable to adjust cloudy weather as results company started to recruiting by hobbies that who are keen to work at beach and coastal areas. Moreover, a few International companies recruiting unmarried people as because of they have to work sometimes at nights as well as posting at different locations, thus it suits only single persons and it easily avoid recruiting married applicants as they do not match for this job.
On the other hand, some fraudulent companies misguided and revealed employees' personal identification, to illustrate last year an IT company was seized due to a female-staff privacy revealed and being harassed, ultimately female activists identified the incident and seized the company. Although, those such practices could be prevented if the national government and female-activists impose a law strictly to demolish such activities.
To sum up, there are the advantages outweigh the disadvantages to know the applicant personal information. Demerits could be forbidden beforehand if the government impose a law strictly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... both benefited employees and company. some companies send employees globally for p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...mployees opposed to seeking an offer as because of they unable to adjust cloudy weather as resu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...ompanies recruiting unmarried people as because of they have to work sometimes at nights as wel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'work'.
Suggestion: sometimes work
...rried people as because of they have to work sometimes at nights as well as posting at differe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoids'?
Suggestion: avoids
...suits only single persons and it easily avoid recruiting married applicants as they d...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...identification, to illustrate last year an IT company was seized due to a female-staf...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...fication, to illustrate last year an IT company was seized due to a female-staff privac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48648648649 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06797028587 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610038610039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0815531198 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.1 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275580706007 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101952034949 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615391759198 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148889498991 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782558996517 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.