The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.
The pie chart enumerates the information regarding the uk students who replies the query about managing finance while tabular chart depicts the percentage of people who organised from different age group.
It is vivid, the first illustration articulates about the students who able to maintain their performance about 55 percent which is considered to be fairly organised in managing the finance while the 20℅ of students who were not able to reply properly to questions they not good enough to manage the finance. Similarly, the another sector reveals about 21 percent of the students were able to respond very well organised while 4 percent of the respondents were not able to answer properly.
Heading toward, the second illustration tells us the 18 percent of respondents who are aged up to 22 years were able to answer in well manner similarly, the students who aged between 23 to 25 years replied the questions well and who pupils over 26 years up to 35 percent organised well.
Overall, the first illustration enumerates the students who were able to reply in fairly manner those were considered better in managing finance and from second chart depicts the who respondents from the age group of 26 years, made their performance better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...stration articulates about the students who able to maintain their performance about 55 ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08737864078 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68022717005 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461165048544 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8409664114 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 209.6 112.824112599 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.2 22.9334400587 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0626027881345 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041758281288 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.022446670738 0.0843802449381 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.042586488046 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177133181769 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.1 13.2329268293 175% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 61.2550243902 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.13 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.