Given are the two maps depicting the sea changes in the communal room’s arrangement during a course of five years to date.
It is conspicuous that the chamber’s area has not altered, except for the refurbishment and installation of a handful of amenities to make the room less vacant and more lavish.
It was a rudimentary area that garnered little notice five years ago when it was untapped. To be more specific, there were merely four sets of circular tables and six chairs laid in the center position, along with a cabinet for personal items on the bottom right corner. Meanwhile, the entire north section of the room was devoted to the essential utilities for the students such as: a sink, cupboard, two adjacent benches, a microwave, and a refrigerator laid out in the following sequence from left to right.
Hitherto, two of the four tables have been removed and replaced by a lengthy rectangular table with a massive capacity on the left side of the main door accessed from the main door. In the northern side, there is a moderate change as the second bench has been discarded for the appearance of a new microwave, along with a subtle insertion of a drink vending machine directly underneath the refrigerator to serve the refreshment needs of learners. Ultimately, the most prominent innovation is that students nowadays can genuinely enjoy a television with three recliners on the lower right corner of the room and a bench with a laptop for four people sitting immediately placed nearby.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the sea changes ...
^^^
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he two maps depicting the sea changes in the communal room’s arrangement during a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while, except for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90196078431 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78034514189 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592156862745 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3014466357 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.25 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.875 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115276577736 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496232660754 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447306429837 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759970738147 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293489114151 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.