The diagrams show changes in a student common room.
Given are the two maps depicting the transformations in the layout of the student shared room over the period of 5 years.
It is conspicuous that after five years, the room has undergone major renovation, adding facilities to serve students to study and entertain more comfortably.
Five years ago, the middle of the room was occupied by four 6-seater round tables. In addition, to maximize the quality of learning for students, the north side of the tables was coordinated with a row of convenient features from left to right, a sink, a cupboard, two benches, a microwave and a refrigerator respectively. Meanwhile, a cabinet was placed on the bottom right-hand corner.
To date, after being modified, the seating capacity of the room has also been increased significantly. Currently, the room has only 2 round tables, in the interim, a table with 8 seats and a bench of laptops for 4 people have taken up the space of the two removed sets of tables and chairs. The cabinet’s location is now used to place a TV with three comfortable chairs. Conversely, the range of convenient features for students also has experienced no change, except for the alteration of one bench by another newly-added microwave. The renovation is so modern that students can enjoy a drink using the drink machine located adjacent to the refrigerator.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps depicting the transformati...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, if, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97757847534 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99510617216 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614349775785 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.33902439024 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8807285994 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133967421567 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053489656935 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446110750551 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934836293517 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400008185148 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.