Given are the two maps contrasting the difference in the place of the facilities in the student shared room during a period of 5 years to date.
It is perceptible that the space has experienced drastic modifications, especially in the center with the appearance of some new facilities compared to 5 years ago.
Previously, the common room was laid out in a spanking simple way. The entrance on the west side of the map could lead to a space which was occupied by four round tables arranged in the middle of the room. On the bottom right hand corner, there was a small cabinet to store some common items, in the interim, the north sector was divided into 6 separated zones where a sink, a cupboard, 2 consecutive benches, a microwave and a refrigerator were arranged from west to east respectively.
Hitherto, this room has had prominent modifications in the central area. The two round tables have been replaced by an 8-person long table opposite the cupboard and a bench for users to use laptops at the bottom of the room. Moving to the northern area, the bench has been replaced by another microwave. What is even more striking is the appearance of a drinks machine on the right hand side of the room alongside the television and 3 armchairs, in the original location of the cabinet, to facilitate students in watching TV.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the two maps contrasting the difference...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69957081545 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78346612928 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583690987124 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.084431783 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163072928386 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670606540388 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513618546584 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852058082509 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497360808717 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.