The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two maps comparing the physical changes of the Southwest airport at present and after a year of renovation.
It is conspicuous that after undergoing expansion and development, the area seems to be much more modern with further facilities added. Moreover, the north of the airport is likely to be the focal point of this modernizing plan.
With a glance at the renovating plan, gates in and out of the airport are about to be double in number. Separately, from the departure gate, passengers now take tickets at the check-in counter located in the far left of the space when a café put in the opposite site aids them in relaxing before entering the security passport control area. However, under renovation, the appearance of the bag drop in the check-in counter’s original room will lead to the relocation of both the café and the check-in counter. While the former is moved to the east of the bag drop, the latter then is reconstructed at the bottom left-hand side of the departures area. Correspondingly, there are distinct changes that are going to eventuate in the arrivals space. Although no facility is put in it to date, a year later will witness the great development with the addition of a new café on the top right-hand corner and an ATM machine down south. Even a new car rent is also equipped to adapt to customers’ needs.
At present, towards the back of the airport, an empty space leads fly-goers to different 8 gates, numbered from one to eight, where they are able to board the craft. On the opposite, a new shop is likely to be erected to fill the hallway in the future. Furthermore, in order for the convenience to serve customers, the airport is planned to make a strong expansion in the north of the airport with another 10 gates erected in the next year. Impressively, a sky train is prepared to appear in this space, which will replace completely the existed walkway
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...present and after a year of renovation. It is conspicuous that after undergoing ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
... and out of the airport are about to be double in number. Separately, from the departure gate, p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'departures'' or 'departure's'?
Suggestion: departures'; departure's
...ted at the bottom left-hand side of the departures area. Correspondingly, there are distin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 906, Rule ID: ATM_MACHINE[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant ('M' stands for 'machine'). Use simply 'ATM'.
Suggestion: ATM
...afé on the top right-hand corner and an ATM machine down south. Even a new car rent is also...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 61, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'lead'?
Suggestion: lead
...the back of the airport, an empty space leads fly-goers to different 8 gates, numbere...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 334.0 196.424390244 170% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73652694611 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73700516007 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 106.607317073 177% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565868263473 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2369672757 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07142857143 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148095475811 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457325889352 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427828623209 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914164401126 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300316925051 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 40.7170731707 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.