The differences in wheat exports over three different area
The line chart given below illustrate the contrast in wheat exports in three differ zona. Overall it can be seen that Canada was the hugest wheat exports country from two others area and australia registered as the weaknest. It measured in million of tones
From 1985, Canada led wheat exports stood at 19. Australia had amount of wheat exports was smaller than european community. In next year Canada and European declined moderately of 2. While australia increased minimally from 15 to 16 between 1985 and 1986 but wheat exports dipped rapidly in the following years and Canada saw a considerable growth in wheat exports from 17 to 21. The total wheat exports in Canada was bigger than european community in first three years
In 1988, there was similarity wheat exports in european community with the previous year but the amount of wheat exports in european community was higher than australia and Canada had an enormous rise of 4 between 1987-1988. The total wheat exports which owned by Canada was double amount from australia in 1998. Both, registered a period of volatility till end year. Whereas amount wheat exports in european community reached a peak at 6 over two years. There was bigger than ascension happened in Canada
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...istered as the weaknest. It measured in million of tones From 1985, Canada led wheat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d a period of volatility till end year. Whereas amount wheat exports in european commun...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99516908213 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43227959679 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512077294686 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 76.1592502915 43.030603864 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297562477331 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118060030469 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097572394053 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225143352799 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765056481636 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.