Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology
In today's world, it is become a controversial topic that a students in all college should study whatever they like or should only be permitted to study subjects that used in the future, especially science and technology. Same might had limited view about the benefits and drawback of both or do not have reason to study another related subject. While several students brave take a risk to study anything who they like. Both sides will be discussed, carefully.
On the one hand, students who learn whatever they like actually has several advantages to their future. Firstly, the college student was able added adeptness and lore from the fields their like beside the education major. Generally after chosen this way transform view of student become broader in the future, be able seen a handful medical student who learn business besides main major obtained apoortunity to establish clinic after graduated. Secondly, when college students studied many thing automatically expand friend networking since early stage. Those was good to have friendship investment cause became partner collaboration on job or support each other in the future. In the business field this proves when as college student had widest friendship during learn another subject study usually became customers from their business or even partner who made investments. In developed countries there is more steady from only learn subject which considered useful in the future that was being free to study anything outside main subject
On the other hand, if student obedient to study affiliated their fields study or which reputed rewarding in the future was able declined college student creativity. It is due to take good chance who should can develop creativity in other subject study. For instance eliminating job opportunities for graduate who only study technology even though had business ability in the future. Their can not establish technology company, instead as employees. Therefore society was better to leave the old opinion of study subject that the public opinion are useful in the future. It is no doubt decided only study related subject was not better than learn anything while at university
To sum up, personally I do not believed old statement about focus for study subject which bring benefit in future. I would like to get positive impact from learn many things before graduate. Even though it can spend time in university but had big impact in future. However it depends on an people and individual that whether be ordinary college students who study related their subject or challenges them self with study any subject their like
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 58, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...it is become a controversial topic that a students in all college should study whatever th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eason to study another related subject. While several students brave take a risk to s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun thing seems to be countable; consider using: 'many things'.
Suggestion: many things
...Secondly, when college students studied many thing automatically expand friend networking ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...nd friend networking since early stage. Those was good to have friendship investment ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 737, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the widest'.
Suggestion: had the widest
...eld this proves when as college student had widest friendship during learn another subject...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...chnology company, instead as employees. Therefore society was better to leave the old opi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s for study subject which bring benefit in future. I would like to get positive impact fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d time in university but had big impact in future. However it depends on an people and in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...niversity but had big impact in future. However it depends on an people and individual ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...impact in future. However it depends on an people and individual that whether be o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, no doubt, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20754716981 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51053316825 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51179245283 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.4198696718 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.210526316 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417273651585 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128491241656 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103823983741 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288113501312 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10040020304 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.