Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measure are requiredpossibly some of the society possessed health on themselves and will raise awareness about their health after the government increased the sport facilities. It can be believed that a part of people already have an active lifestyle and they need a better facilities to improve their health. For instance, they are too bored for having the exercises at the gum whose need some fresh air such as jogging in the park or riverside. It means that the government have to reconstruction the parks and riversides such as adding up fitness or sport tools. Therefore, the sport lovers will get the advantages for expanding the sport facilities. Looking at the comparison, there is no doubt that increasing number of sport facilities is not effective before most of the society realize about their health care.
In conclusion, from right here I stand that I don’t believed that improving the number of sport facilities is the best way for increasing public health. In my opinion, it gives more drawbacks rather than the benefits.
In today's world. It is become controversial topic that the best method for reforming public health with add amount of sport facilities or those way not have huge impact and believed many action needed. Several people have disadvantages of view about the improve method with supplied sport facilities or think somw advantages might can supported increasing publi health with another step. Both of view will be discussed with fully considered
On the hand hand, people opinion that increasing the total sports facilities had few impact on health society and was able improved other way had positiv effect. Firstly, a person's health level was not able only be improved by exercise. But supported with daily healthy food. As some public figure who live healthy with a vegetarian diet way. Anotjer factor was adequate rest. Those was quite difficult for humans todat had dense work hours and high stress levels. Yoyng excecutives who live to work trigger ilness which caused by fatigue such as heart diswase even though their exercises regulary. For that it was very important had many method to rise the quality of public health, not only provided sports facilities but in modify life style.
Differs witg the benefits above, the drawaback which occured when Government add the total of sport facilities was not equal with people interest to exercise. At last, the facilities was meaningless, cause grow amlunt of that not comparable with increasing public consciousness to obtain health life with used sport toolw. Such as case in several city which prepared sport facilities in some public place only survived at along time. Therefore must considered society readiness in environment when sport facilities will buolt. It is no doubt based by the comparison, increasing number of sport facilitied not effective solution without desire a health life
To sum up, from right here I stand I do not believed that sport facility which enhanced was best method to accelarate public health. In my opinion, it is gives more disadvantages rather than the advantages. However, it depends public awareness about health life supported by sport facilities
Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however say that this would have little effect on public health and the other measure are required possibly some of the society possessed health on themselves and will raise awareness about their health after the government increased the sport facilities. It can be believed that a part of people already have an active lifestyle and they need a better facilities to improve their health. For instance, they are too bored for having the exercises at the gum whose need some fresh air such as jogging in the park or riverside. It means that the government have to reconstruction the parks and riversides such as adding up fitness or sport tools. Therefore, the sport lovers will get the advantages for expanding the sport facilities. Looking at the comparison, there is no doubt that increasing number of sport facilities is not effective before most of the society realize about their health care.
In conclusion, from right here I stand that I don’t believed that improving the number of sport facilities is the best way for increasing public health. In my opinion, it gives more drawbacks rather than the benefits.
In today's world. It is become controversial topic that the best method for reforming public health with add amount of sport facilities or those way not have huge impact and believed many action needed. Several people have disadvantages of view about the improve method with supplied sport facilities or think somw advantages might can supported increasing public health with another step. Both of view will be discussed with fully considered
On the hand hand, people opinion that increasing the total sports facilities had few impact on health society and was able improved other way had positive effect. Firstly, a person's health level was not able only be improved by exercise. But supported with daily healthy food. As some public figure who live healthy with a vegetarian diet way. Another reason was adequate rest. Those was quite difficult for humans today had dense work hours and high stress levels. Young executives who live to work trigger illness which caused by fatigue such as heart disease even though their exercises regularly. For that it was very important had many method to rise the quality of public health, not only provided sports facilities but in modify life style.
Differs with the benefits above, the drawback which occurred when Government add the total of sport facilities was not equal with people interest to exercise. At last, the facilities was meaningless, cause grow amount of that not comparable with increasing public consciousness to obtain health life with used sport tools. Such as case in several city which prepared sport facilities in some public place only survived at along time. Therefore must considered society readiness in environment when sport facilities will built. It is no doubt based by the comparison, increasing number of sport facilitated not effective solution without desire a health life
To sum up, from right here I stand I do not believed that sport facility which enhanced was best method to accelerate public health. In my opinion, it is gives more disadvantages rather than the advantages. However, it depends public awareness about health life supported by sport facilities
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the other measure are required possibly some of the society possessed health on themselves ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wbacks rather than the benefits. In todays world. It is become controversia...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this way' or 'those ways'?
Suggestion: this way; those ways
... with add amount of sport facilities or those way not have huge impact and believed many ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...people have disadvantages of view about the improve method with supplied sport facilities o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 8, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: hand
...scussed with fully considered On the hand hand, people opinion that increasing the tot...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...her way had positive effect. Firstly, a persons health level was not able only be impro...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... But supported with daily healthy food. As some public figure who live healthy wit...
^^
Line 9, column 379, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
... way. Another reason was adequate rest. Those was quite difficult for humans today ha...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 637, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun method seems to be countable; consider using: 'many methods'.
Suggestion: many methods
...rly. For that it was very important had many method to rise the quality of public health, n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 78, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'adds'.
Suggestion: adds
...drawback which occurred when Government add the total of sport facilities was not e...
^^^
Line 11, column 423, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
...s in some public place only survived at along time. Therefore must considered society read...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 435, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...blic place only survived at along time. Therefore must considered society readiness in en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 521, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
Suggestion: build
... environment when sport facilities will built. It is no doubt based by the comparison...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the best'.
Suggestion: was the best
...eved that sport facility which enhanced was best method to accelerate public health. In ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2850.0 1615.20841683 176% => OK
No of words: 552.0 315.596192385 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16304347826 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.20363070211 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60229438051 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451086956522 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 882.9 506.74238477 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 16.0721442886 168% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0038211657 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.555555556 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7037037037 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 14.0 5.01903807615 279% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451249770678 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131210315239 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158912712737 0.0667982634062 238% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244963289643 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135134755203 0.056905535591 237% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.