The figures for imprinsonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980
The bar chart given below illustrate the personage for imprisonment in five states during five decades started from 1930 to 1980. It can be seen that along five decade a fluctuation amount of the figures for imprisonment happened Canada registered as the highest state with the personage for imprisonment and the lowest was great britain.
Regarding to the data, united states had the biggest total of the figures for imprisonment between four other countries. That was increased sharply from 100 to 130 between 1930 and 1940 then in next decade amount of the figures for imprisonment was fluctuated. Followed by Canada, in the first year had higher amount of the figures for imprisonment than United States, reduced 10 in 1940 then be volatile. In the last year reach 90 figures for imprisonment, that amount was smaller than united states. The next country with similarity total of the figures for imprisonment in 1930 with UK is new Zealand. But dipped rapidly from 100 to 55 between 1930 and 1940 then saw sight increased in the following year, except between 1960 and 1970, there was a period stability.
Two another countries becoming two of bottom states with total of the figures for imprisonments was lower than three states other. Australia had larger amount of the figures for imprisonment than Great Britain, the figures for imprisonment reached a peak in first year then fluctuated during five decades. And in the ended year the amount was smaller than great britain. Therefore great britain started with the lowest total of the figures for imprisonment, in five decades there was significant rose each decades of 55, from 30 to 85 between 1930
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...to 1980. It can be seen that along five decade a fluctuation amount of the figures for...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... amount was smaller than great britain. Therefore great britain started with the lowest t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, then, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02898550725 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66621372965 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445652173913 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0569748316 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.666666667 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352565209234 0.215688989381 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158365724809 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692475750602 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26904353859 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00738783589528 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.