ELECTRONIC GOODS AND SERVICES BY AGE OF HEAD OF HOUSEHOLD
The bar chart reveals information on using electronic goods and services by age of head of household. Units are measured in pounds per week (ppw).
From an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the five selected aged groups: 30-, 30-49, 50-64, 65-74, 75+. Actually, the number of TVs, videos, computers was significantly higher than that of TV, satellite rental, internet, excepting for adults aged 75+. The figure given for population aged 30-49 used TV, video, computer appeared to be by far the highest one among the five chosen age groups, with over 12 pounds per week (ppw). Conversely, the quantity of head of household aged 75+ was found to be the lowest one, with around 2ppw.
Surprisingly, the aged 30- and 30-49 spent to TV, Videos, computers was found to be over 11ppw, being significantly higher over two times than that of TV, satellite rental, internet (around 5ppw). The figure given for adults aged 75+ constantly stood at the lowest both electronic goods and services, with 1,8 ppw and 2,1 ppw, respectively.
It is interesting to note that, the frequency of the aged 50-64 and 65-74 was determined to be in the middle group. The number of the age 50-64 group spent on electronic goods was just under 8ppw and services were about 5ppw. The same of the aged 65-74, they spend on electronic goods was 5 ppw and services was just over 3 ppw
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to age'
Suggestion: to age
...r the highest one among the five chosen age groups, with over 12 pounds per week pp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, conversely, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1145.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83122362869 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58337446751 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535864978903 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9528216443 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.090909091 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.18181818182 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334400095848 0.215688989381 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161179598337 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167692791194 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252785092393 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133281860663 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.