The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs illustrate British parent’s spend for children’s sport activities each month in average and a number of kids who actually join in three types of sports which are football, athletics and swimming in seven years period. As can be seen from the graphs, sport’s spending for children seemed to increase dramatically from within seven years; in addition, football was considered to be the most popular sport compared to athletics and swimming.
From 2008 to 2014, average monthly spend in pounds is rising. The figure was exactly 20 pounds and after seven years it increased to approximately 32 pounds.
According to an amount of participation, the figure of football was outstanding two others. In 2008, there were around 8 million British children who played football while the figure of swimming was nearly 2.5 million and athletics’ data was almost insignificant. However, in 2014, the participation on athletics jumped to just under 5 million children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | marin123 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | pritam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | skelly | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period. 61
- the graph shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories 56
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing, including the process by which information is feedback to earlier stages to enable adjustment. 78
- the graph shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3935483871 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09425973187 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651612903226 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0315053066 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.428571429 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216435170121 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951032194126 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805460624147 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128820491089 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078752819419 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.