The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts illustrate the monthly average expenditure for children’s sports and the children’s participation for three different sports in UK from 2008 to 2014.
Overall, the spending on children’s sports has dramatically increased throughout the period. Number of children who had taken part in the three sports; football, Athletics and Swimming were risen their numbers throughout the time. Football was dominated compared to the other two sports from 2008 to 2014.
It is clear, UK parents were spent 20 pounds at the beginning of the period, the highest number of players, that was over 7.5 million players played football. In 2010 the expenditure on sports has come to 25 pounds whereas the players of football, athletics and swimming were 8, 2.5 and 1.5 millions respectively.
After 2010, Athletics overpass the number of children who engaged in swimming and came to the second place with 5 million students in 2012. The money spent for the sports were over 3 million in 2014 while the number of players of football, Athletics and swimming were 8, 5 and 3 millions respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27374301676 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9837737267 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513966480447 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1082154596 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33740609002 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154635428746 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792734412481 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220668467276 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917443651188 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.