Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
To solve the poverty among the nations, wealthier countries should support poorer countries by money instead of giving other types of helps. I totally agree with this statement as it associates to manage the receiving investments effectively .
It is inevitable that a rich country may not know about the exact budget that is in scarcity of funds. Most of the leaders in poorer countries misuse the funds for their own benefits instead of country’s development. the majority of the politicians in third world countries spend the money that has subsidize from the wealthier countries as on the areas that the personally advantageous for their positions. For instance, the survey done by international red cross society has revealed 80% of financial aid of poorer countries has misused for political corruption.
On the other hand, the investments for basic needs are more essential in the poorer nations. Education, healthcare and technology are some of the areas of more funds needed. Mainly the developed country could be support in materials, knowledge and medicines to minimize the misuse of money. Further, they can assess the progress of the investment. I believe rather than putting money, it is worthwhile to supporting in the other types of funds and monitor to avoid the corruptions. For instance, after the terror attacked to temple truth in Sri Lanka, Japan has donated their service, professional knowledge and construction materials except money to rebuild it as the same way it was consist.
To conclude, professional knowledge, technology and materials are more beneficial for the poorer countries rather than giving money from wealthier countries to poorer countries. By avoiding financial aids third world countries can have the total benefits of the receiving funds
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...statement as it associates to manage the receiving investments effectively . ...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s it associates to manage the receiving investments effectively . It is inevi...
^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the receiving investments effectively . It is inevitable that a rich country...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... instead of country's development. the majority of the politicians in third wo...
^^^
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'subsidized'.
Suggestion: subsidized
...orld countries spend the money that has subsidize from the wealthier countries as on the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ducation, healthcare and technology are some of the areas of more funds needed. Mainly the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 406, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'support'?
Suggestion: support
...than putting money, it is worthwhile to supporting in the other types of funds and monitor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 686, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...ey to rebuild it as the same way it was consist. To conclude, professional knowled...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he total benefits of the receiving funds
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, third, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39361702128 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9137398663 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4136577926 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.642857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369711555156 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124483503198 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103930560983 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24963358003 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728612965963 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.