Some people might agree with this statement and other people might disagree with this view. I strongly believe this statement and these are my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First of all, it has relative with base of poor countries. We should to understand why these poor countries are poor? Most of poor countries are government are corrupt and inefficient. It means if developed countries only give money and it will did not have a good results, because the money was embezzled by their government. I have a story saying from my best friend. She says that she has a friend is very poor and always borrow money from his friend. This boy explained that is his mother was ill. As his classmates and friends, people always give he some financial aid for his mother until some classmates decided to visit his mother. These classmates felt shocks for that his mother still sick and doctor says he never paid for money. They ask for this boy why he cheat to them, finally they know the fact, nobody this boy often takes drugs. These money all wasted for drugs. This is a terrible thing. With the similar reason, these money never arrived to the hands of common poor people. Even if these poor countries does not how to arrange these money.
Secondly, I think developed countries should give other types of help. Such as they can make some people help them to build teaching building. Let some teacher to teach students from poor countries some knowledge. They can teach them how to solve problem of farming, how to solve their starving.
To sum up, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...d countries only give money and it will did not have a good results, because the mo...
^^^
Line 2, column 770, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'cheats'.
Suggestion: cheats
...for money. They ask for this boy why he cheat to them, finally they know the fact, no...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 848, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'These moneys', 'These monies'?
Suggestion: This money; These moneys; These monies
...act, nobody this boy often takes drugs. These money all wasted for drugs. This is a terribl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 933, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...errible thing. With the similar reason, these money never arrived to the hands of common po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 995, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ved to the hands of common poor people. Even if these poor countries does not how to ar...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1048, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
... poor countries does not how to arrange these money. Secondly, I think developed countrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, i think, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72664359862 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27214210774 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515570934256 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.765142681 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.0476190476 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7619047619 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.9879759519 376% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301229040028 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101426912067 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114546626495 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221074790009 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126378787353 0.056905535591 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.0946893788 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.25 8.58950901804 73% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 78.4519038076 46% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.