Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Argument
funding financial for poorer countries is just a temporary method, however, some people argue that budget is a main source helping these countries growing up much so that it must have. Notwithstanding, there is no doubt that the majority of countries, which receive these finances, usually get trouble with money worse than they do not do. Thus, poverty need to consider into the problems of themselves and avoid dependence budget in any case to solve their problems better than just giving them money.
Without doubt, the third world owe many rich countries to solve their problems provisionally include supporting for damage harvest, making up the toll of wars, and so on. some of these poor countries are even sold one part of their land to debt. The amount of money grow on the tree for the poor countries is benefactor save lives of them. Therefore, many people appreciate financial aid. Although it seemingly like everything are tackled, they still have new owes, except they handle the main problems and improve it. For example, scientists can create new seed avoiding insect and survive strongly in drought or dry conditions or deal with terrorism about why they persecute.
The second argument is about the sense of inhabitants about being given money. people believe that when they fund to poorer countries, they help them to have a better life. it is just right in some circumstances. For example, one little girls helps african deal with petecchial fever by buying for them mosquito-net and blankets. however, if the african do not decrease the number of mosquitoes in their countries, the thing she does so meaningless.
To sum up, it is good to give money to poorer countries, however, it need to limited. The poor countries have to handle the problems by themselves and do not to independence to the budget. Personally, learning from developing countries is a good way for them to develop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Funding
funding financial for poorer countries is just ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orary method, however, some people argue that budget is a main source helping the...
^^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith terrorism about why they persecute. The second argument is about the sense o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...of inhabitants about being given money. people believe that when they fund to poorer c...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
..., they help them to have a better life. it is just right in some circumstances. Fo...
^^
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ing for them mosquito-net and blankets. however, if the african do not decrease the num...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ies, the thing she does so meaningless. To sum up, it is good to give money to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e does so meaningless. To sum up, it is good to give money to poorer count...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, still, therefore, third, thus, even so, for example, no doubt, in any case, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00940438871 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67201249067 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561128526646 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9341220039 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274665834284 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872253434427 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547816036333 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183893211532 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658918458119 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.