The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

Essay topics:

The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

The graph illustrates data about the amount of tourism went to three museums in London from June to September in the year 2013.
As can be seen from the chart, British Museum had a significant tend and had the highest level of visitor came to during 2013. Overall, almost lines of chart had upward trend.
To start with the highest point in the line chart, the amount of tourism increased considerably. Further more, British museum’s line reached a peak at approximately 750000 inhabitants in July. However, the line saw a substantial deceleration. Clearly, in August saw to hit the lowest point at 500000 people, followed by gradually accelerated.
In addition, before hit the bottom point in July, there was a significant fall in the number of citizens come to visit Science Museum. The similar was true for that of Natural History Museum. There was a slight decrease from June to August. Besides, the level of tourism went to see Science Museum slowly rise. It goes without saying that Natural History Museum experienced a moderate increase the amount of visitors.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'trended'.
Suggestion: trended
...erall, almost lines of chart had upward trend. To start with the highest point in th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, in addition, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01117318436 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69689518828 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59217877095 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4108084724 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.75 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245263710469 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08072205672 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891471264495 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162938397699 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117954494481 0.0819641961636 144% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.