The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts illustrate the information about the monthly money British parents consume on their children's sporty activities and the number of the British children take part in three sports between 2008 and 2014.
Overall, the first chart shows the amount of money spent on children’s sports by parents slowly rose from 2008 to 2014. Moreover, the second shows the figure for children consuming their time on sporty acts generally increased over the period of time, from 2008 to 2014.
In the first chart, the account for money British parents spending in 2008 hit the lowest point, at 20 pounds. Moreover, it rose to 25 pounds in 2010 and, in 2012, it increased to approximately 27 pounds. Furthermore, it is just under twice in the spending money of parents in England in 2014 than the spending in 2008, nearly 32 pounds.
In the second chart, the number of children playing foot ball slowly increased from about 8 to around 9.5 million during the time between 2008 and 2014. In addition, the figure for children participating in swimming slowly and regularly increased from about 2 to approximately 4.5 million, from 2008 to 2014. Moreover, before decreasing from 5 to just under 5 million children from 2012 to 2014, the account for children taking part in athletics significantly increased from just under 1 in 2010 to 5 million children in 2012 and it had maintained amid 2008 and 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...porty acts generally increased over the period of time, from 2008 to 2014. In the first chart...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 33.7804878049 169% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1182.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90456431535 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59028863652 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452282157676 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2741655726 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438385719289 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214754052628 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148421111811 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319167966574 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150423111375 0.0819641961636 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.