Contained in the first line graph is data pertaining to the amount of money that British parents spent on their children's sports while the second one represented the number of their offsprings who joined in three different selected sports from 2008 to 2014. Overall, the trend illustrated in both graphs was upward during the period.
Regarding the first graph, one sees a pattern of increase. It is clear that the average spent rose steadily by approximately 12 pounds per month, jumping from exactly 20 pounds/month in 2008 to just over 30 pounds/month in 2014.
Turning to the next graph, the trend in evidence was one of growth. Over the given period, the most popular sport for British children was football, thus the number of children participating in this sport started at about 8 millions and then grew gradually to around 9 millions in 2014. The trend was similar for swimming, which witnessed a moderate climb from just under 2.5 millions to about 4 millions as the period ended. However, in spite of commencing with the lowest point, which was not over 1 millions, the number of children joining in athletics rocketed to a peak at 5 millions in 2012 before a slight decrease to just under 5 millions. In addition, from 2010 to 2012, there was a noticeable event that the number of children who took part in athletics surpassed the number of children who chose swimming, making athletics became the second favorite sports.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 808, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to swim'.
Suggestion: to swim
...passed the number of children who chose swimming, making athletics became the second fav...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, then, thus, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90163934426 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61286482956 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569672131148 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.1917884595 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.888888889 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1111111111 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307781453343 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114899158213 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121897415036 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204932530648 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108286026725 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.