Contained in the line graph provided is data pertaining to CO2 emissions released from human by metric tonnes in four different countries from 1967 and 2007. Overall, there was two countries that witnessed a downward trend, whereas the trend for the others was upward.
Regarding Britain and Sweden, one sees a pattern of decrease. It is clear that Britain, who had the highest amount of CO2 emissions, showed a steady reduction from just under 11 metric tonnes to about 8 metric tonnes of CO2 over the period. The trend is similar for the CO2 amount in Sweden, as it dropped remarkably from around 8.5 metric tonnes in 1967 to just under 6 metric tonnes in 2007 after reaching peak at just over 10 metric tonnes in 1977.
Turning to Italy and Portugal, the trend in evidence was one of increase. It is apparent that the amount of CO2 produced by Italian experienced a considerable growth, from just above 4 metric tonnes in 1967 to nearly 8 metric tonnes, making it became the nation that released the second highest CO2 emissions as the period ended. Comparable trend took place with CO2 amount in Portugal, which surged by 4 metric tonnes to the same amount of CO2 in Sweden in 2007.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
.... It is clear that Britain, the country had highest amount of CO2 emissions, showed a stead...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41683161742 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6417143364 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117613294573 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608603780212 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348965573135 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090861052962 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199108099348 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.