Contained in the bar chart provided is data pertaining to expenditure on three different fast foods per capita per week by income levels in the United Kingdom, and the line graph demonstrated fast food consumption from 1970 to 1990.
Regarding the bar chart, one sees the total amount of money spent on hamburgers considerably exceeded the total amount of money spent on two remaining fast foods, which were pizza, fish and chips. It is clear that hamburgers were the most popular fast foods, as high and average income consumers spent well over 40 pence and nearly 35 pence per week, respectively, on this food. For fish and chips, consumers with average income spent precisely 25 pence per week, whereas the same amount of 18 pence per week was spent by high and low income groups. With regards to pizza, expenditure on this food reached roughly 20 pence per week in high income group, but average and low income groups spent only around 13 pence and 7 pence on pizza, in that same order.
Turning to the line graph, there was an upward trend in pizza and hamburgers, while the trend for fish and chips was downward. It is evident that hamburger consumption increased dramatically, jumping from just under 100 grams to well over 500 grams during the period. There was a similar trend for pizza, which witnessed a steady rise from approximately 50 grams to just north of 300 grams as the period ended. However, in spite of starting at 300 grams in 1970, fish and chip consumption decreased gradually by 100 grams to 200 grams in 1985 after an inappreciable growth to around 220 grams in 1990.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, regarding, well, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75539568345 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46794049634 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514388489209 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 380.7 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.7361317353 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.888888889 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8888888889 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209143814503 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096051144023 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670854279853 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149100164374 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678742896839 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.