Contained in the pie chart provided is data pertaining to the proportion of poor females, while the bar chart demonstrates the rates of poverty by gender and age in America in 2008. Overall, females who were single with no dependent children made up the largest proportion of total, and the poverty rate of females were higher than that of males.
In regard to the pie chart, one sees a noteworthy gain in single females without dependent children. It is evident that the percentage of poor single females without children accounted considerably 54% of total, but the figure of single females who had children were only 8%. For married females, those who had children made up 12% which was 14% lower than the proportion of those with dependent children.
Turning to the bar chart, the trend in evidence was one of downward. Apparently, the poverty rate of males under 5 years old was just over 20% and then decreased gradually to approximately to 7% when they reached 59 years old. After that, the males' poverty rate had a slight increase to about 9% at the age range of 60-64 before dropping inappreciably to around 6% at the age range of 75 and over. There was a similar trend for females as their poverty rates fell, starting from about 21% at the age of under 5 to nearly 15% when they were 75 and older. It is also worth noting that the lowest poverty rate of females was at the age range from 45 to 54, about 8% only.
- the pie chart show the electricity generated in Germany and france from all sources and renewables in the year 2009. summarize the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Share of total employment, Camba District, 1996-1999 95
- Bar chart: amount spent on consumer goods 67
- Percentage of Australian Men and Women doing Regular Physical Activity in 2010 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 84
The pie chart illustrates the
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of women in United States, from various family structures, living in poverty during the year 2008. The pie chart compares rate of poverty that prevailed among different sexes and age groups.
It is evident that women faced far more financial constraints than men and by far the most affected group was single women with no dependent children.
The most financially secure population was married women with no dependent children as only 8% of then lived under poverty line. In contrast, single women with no dependent children comprised more than half of the poor population.
While women of all age groups were affected more by poverty than men of same age, just above 20% poverty-stricken women belonged to age group 18-24 and under 5. On the other hand, as the age increased, a steadily decreasing trend could be seen in men. While 20% of 5 years faced financial difficulties, in those over 75 years these figures had dropped to less than 5%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
...y reached 59 years old. After that, the males poverty rate had a slight increase to a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, so, then, while, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56420233463 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45264002253 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501945525292 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2045451611 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.3 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197465360186 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929642919422 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688932836184 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139505206326 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725543807666 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.